New Chinese Dam Project Fuels Ethnic Conflict in Sudan

nubian pharaohDams have impoverished tens of thousands of people and triggered serious human rights violations in Sudan. Now Chinese companies have won contracts to build three more hydropower projects in the country. Of particular concerns are plans to dam the Nile near Kajbar, on the lands of ancient Nubia. This project has already caused massive human rights abuses. Affected people are strongly opposed to it, and have raised the specter of a second Darfur conflict.

The Sudanese government plans to transform the Nile, the only stretch of fertile land north of Khartoum, into a string of five reservoirs (see map). Built by Chinese, German and French companies, the Merowe Dam was completed two years ago. The project doubled Sudan’s electricity generation, but displaced more than 50,000 people from the Nile Valley to arid desert locations. Thousands of people who refused to leave their homes were flushed out by the reservoir, and protests were violently suppressed. The UN Rapporteur on Housing Rights expressed “deep concern” about the human rights violations in the project, and asked the dam builders to halt construction in 2007 – to no avail.

Read more…

Kenya’s Smallest Indigenous Tribe Faces Extinction

Impacts of Climate Change Takes Toll on Their Livelihoods

By Shadrack Kavilu for Gáldu

El Molo woman

NAIROBI, Kenya — Kenya’s smallest Indigenous tribe that resides in the world’s largest desert lake is in the verge of extinction as climate change and human activities continues unabated on the tributaries that feed the lake.

The El Molo tribe, arguably the smallest tribe in Kenya that inhabits in the Southeastern shores of Lake Turkana is an endangered tribe as competition for the lakes resources intensifies.

With receding water levels, prolonged drought and waves of insecurity in this part of northeastern province, the El molo tribe that entirely depends on fishing is an endangered tribe as the lake waters continues to recede.

Read more…

Group says power project will increase poverty

Boy fetches water in Lake Turkana - Daily NationChina has been urged to withdraw the funding of the now controversial construction of Gibe III hydropower dam in Ethiopia.

Through a petition by a group calling itself the Friends of Lake Turkana (FoLT) to the Chinese ambassador to Kenya, it is argued that once the project is implemented, the 240-metre high dam will compromise “a very fragile and unique ecosystem” which is identified as a protected area.

According to FoLT chairperson, Ikal Ang’elei, the filling of the reservoir will block the south-western part of the Omo River, threatening the livelihood of more than 200,000 people living in the lower Omo valley.

Read more…


1.7billion dollars dam may sink the hopes of 20,000

Fishermen on Lake Turkana. The main river feeding the lake, the Omo, is threatened by a new hydropower project supported by the governments of Ethiopia and Kenya.

Lake Turkana could be the scene of a major conflict in the near future, environmentalists are warning.
Ten years ago, then Egyptian foreign minister Boutros Boutros-Ghali said the next major wars in Africa would be over water.

Now water diplomacy is starting to take centre-stage in African and global affairs.

Read more…

Ethiopia-Kenya power grid link to go live this year despite protests

President Mwai Kibaki and Ethopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi at the UNCC venue of the AU summit. They signed deals for a new power–grid connection. Photo/PPS

This, combined with Kenya’s strategic location and relatively developed infrastructure, is increasingly pushing the two nations closer.

Kenya enjoys a historical national security arrangement with Ethiopia, which has one of the largest armies in Africa — with 1 million regular troops, not to speak of easy-to-conscript reserves.

Read more…

KPLC Plans Power Purchase Agreement Environmental Impacts on Lake Turkana


The dam’s construction is now 35% complete with the three diversion tunnels to provide a dry space to build the wall now running, a bridge and preparation for the power station, and digging going on. The Ethiopian Government is seeking international funding from the ADB, European Investment Bank, and World Bank to complete the project.

Kenya is part of this national strategy where KPLC at the meeting suggested committing to purchasing up to 400MW, 21% of the power to be produced, under a power purchase agreement (PPO) that is soon to be created. It is through purchases made as defined under the PPO that Ethiopia will be able to pay back its loans to the financiers, without which there is no incentive to finance the project. Though the discussions at the meeting indicated that PPO is yet to be finalized, it seems like we may not have to wait too long as Mr. Patrick Nyoike, Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Energy called for the opening of champagne bottles to celebrate the anticipated success.

“We are going to do everything in our power to fast track this project,” said Emanuel Nzabanita of the African Development Bank, despite previously acknowledging that there are inadequate studies on the potential impacts on Lake Turkana, which is located downstream of the project site. The project is strewn with several other red flags including the procurement of the contractor, Salini, lack of consultation on the Lake Basin communities, and some illegal detaining of our colleagues in Ethiopia who have assisted with advocacy efforts on the matter.

EEPCo has provided three proposed designs for water outlet during the running of the dam to the Kenyan Delegation that visited the dam site earlier this year, yet to be discussed and finalized. However, most of those opposing the dam are primarily concerned on the infilling period of the dam, not necessarily the pursuit of hydrological power, or dams in general.

The current proposal of EEPCo is supposedly letting out a 25m3/sec of water for “ecological sustainability” during the infilling period, to be increased to 1600m3/sec for a period of 10 days during the flooding period. Considering that the Omo river, upon which the Gibe III dam is located, provides up to 80% of the water of Lake Turkana during it’s flooding period, the environmental impacts on the lake are not to be ignored. Yet Mr. Nyoike was quick to refer to FoLT and other activists against the dam as being “anti-development” and brush me off as I attempted to ask about his evidence on their being no significant impacts on Lake Turkana. Many of those present at the meeting claimed that “the Lake is drying up anyway” when I approached them, despite me pointing out that the natural fluctuation of the depth of the levels of Lake Turkana, which the Gibe III will reduce, has been instrumental in maintaining the ecology of the Lake according to hydrological experts. Mr. Nyoike instead defended the project by calling the researchers “quacks”.

I asked if the Ministry of Environment has attempted to look into this claims to give the government the go ahead. The lack of response, Mr. Nyoike’s disapproval to my presence, and ADBs threats to kick me out of the hotel premises leads me to believe the answer is “no”. There are more questions that remain with no response: Will an extended period of filling the dam be better than filling it in two years? Who from the Government is capable of answering our questions with concrete evidence if the experts we work with are “quacks”? What will the treaty between Kenya and Ethiopia involve and who will oversee it? A feeble attempt was made to cut the topic short through a personal invitation for a one-one-one meeting by the PS of Finance, an appointment which was never made.

I am not against the development of Kenya. On the contrary, I would love to wish away the blackouts that I am frequently given the pleasure of experiencing. However, when such development equates to the loss of livelihoods for over 500,000 of the most neglected communities in Kenya and the loss of a World Heritage Site, then I say “no thank you”, I’ll light up my emergency candle. I will light it not only in tribute to those lives to be lost and affected, but also in protest against the power hungry KPLC.


Can we really sit idle as our leaders sign off yet another natural resource to a foreign power? We now fight to save the Mau based on past misdeed, yet were are not fighting current attacks on Lake Turkana, or even the Lamu port. Similar to the Lamu port fiasco, our leaders have been hypnotized by the promised financial investment and funding of a development project that has put little if any consideration on local interests or environmental impacts. In both projects there has been no community consultation, no environmental impact assessment, and no efforts for mitigation on the government’s side. Instead, the guiding principle of the government has been, “develop at any and all costs.” But by “develop”, they are referring to the confines of Nairobi city and other metropolitan cities while the rest of the country remains in the dark, literally. The new path of the power lines proposed by the team was clearly indicative of this as it winds around from the project site in Ethiopia to Longonot station with no power lines for the areas around the Lake Basin.

The Government of Kenya’s total disregard for human lives and pursuit for power by signing of an agreement with the Ethiopian Government despite its constitutional mandate to protect the rights and livelihoods of all Kenyans is yet another indication of the administration’s inadequacies in governance. Until it takes adequate measures to look into the environmental impacts of the dam on the lake, and then acts hastily to mitigate the impacts and hear the cries of the locals, they are as good as one of the cattle rustlers holding a gun to a young child’s’ head simply to earn an additional cow to their already full herd.